Itâs very easy to get lost in the potential of artificial intelligence when talking to Saffron Technologyâs Gayle Sheppard. Fortunately, 31 minutes in, her iPhone reminded me exactly how far commercial AI is from primetime. Tucked away in her bag in the corner of the meeting room, Siriâs virtual ears prick up the first time her name is dropped into our conversation. âShe thinks I insulted her,â Sheppard quips, after Siri gives up with an âIâm sorry, I didnât get that,â before piping down and returning to silent eavesdropping.
While itâs not exactly an exclusive to reveal that Siri isnât the best showcase of how brilliant AI can be, the juxtaposition is quite amusing. Here I am talking to Gayle Sheppard about how her company, acquired by Intel in 2015 after 16 years of independence, is quietly changing the world in subtle but undeniable ways, and a flashy upstart canât resist trying to grab the spotlight.
What do I mean by âchanging the worldâ? Sheppard highlights three examples of Saffronâs work that couldnât be further apart: accurately predicting when aeroplane parts will fail; predicting future patterns in fraud and money laundering; and telling the difference between restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis.
âUsing the philosophy that anything can matter, Saffronâs artificial intelligence was able to push the correct diagnosis up to 96% in just two monthsâ
Itâs the last of these that is the most instructive of how transformative the system can be. Saffron was contacted by a New York cardiologist â Dr Partho Sengupta â who believed that Saffronâs technology might be able to improve condition diagnosis. Even to an expert human eye, echocardiograms of the two conditions look very similar â Senguptaâs own eye was right around 76% of the time, but less experienced doctors were averaging just over 50%.
The doctors were basing their analyses on around seven different attributes, but there were many more that werenât getting a look in. A mind-boggling amount, in fact. âTwenty times in a single heartbeat we capture something like 10,000 attributes in six different zones with 19 different metrics,â Sheppard explains. Using the philosophy that anything can matter, Saffronâs artificial intelligence was able to push the correct diagnosis up to 96% in just two months. âA lA lot of data, unrestrained: no attributes pre-selected. Thatâs where AI can really help the common good.â
That example really sums up Saffronâs approach to AI. The company is an example of âlazy learning AIâ â meaning that it learns everything it can, and then works backwards from there. âThe role of experience is rich and robust, and when you try to reduce it down to a few attributes you lose a lot of information and a lot of personalisation,â Sheppard explains. âThe fundamentals are: learn about everything because anything can matter.â
Unlike deep learning systems, Saffron Technology has no black box, and the approach is completely transparent. âAI has to be explanatory or we lose confidence â we have no trust,â Sheppard explains. âThe whole idea is that we donât know what we donât know, and therefore we can only imagine and model things with either our imagination or what we know.
âSo when weâre constrained to models, weâre always going to leave something out. Weâre always going to reduce the accuracy, inevitably.â Thatâs not to say that deep learning is necessarily inferior to the experiential learning Saffron offers. âWhen weâre in deep learning, models are very important. We need to know what you look like. I need to make sure that when I identify you, Iâm not picking someone who looks like you.â
Sheppard speaks with the authority of someone who has worked in the industry for nearly two decades. âIn 1999 â good idea, but unstructured data wasnât well understood yet,â she explains. There were a few bumps in the road following the dotcom bubble burst and the September 11 attacks, but Saffron has lasted the pace and now finds itself part of Intel. âThey understood what was possible with Saffron, and theyâve been preparing an AI portfolio for some time,â explains Sheppard, who regards the two companies as a âreally good fitâ, and is keen to tap into the companyâs well-regarded community of developers.
Any developers dipping their toes into AI will find things much more welcoming than they were in 1999. Customers now have much more data to share, meaning that Saffron can be a lot more helpful. âThe customers are really smart â they have data scientists and machine-learning experts. We go in and weâre not educating as much â they already have a great foundation of knowledge to work with, and itâs really becoming a marriage of the minds.â
Of course many of those companies have invested in data scientists and machine-learning experts for the same reasons that people fear AI: because it can reduce headcount. I ask Sheppard where Saffron stands on peopleâs fear of redundancy. âWeâre not working on any problems at the present time, proposed to us by industry, that are job-eliminating,â Sheppard says. âWeâre focusing on jobs that canât get done very easily by humans.â Take the area of fraud investigation, for example: âYou canât hire enough people to investigate everything â itâs just impossible because of the volume of transactions. Itâs really about getting everything done, so thereâs less stress on the poor investigators â I canât imagine being in that role, because thereâs some serious fines imposed on the banks if they donât get these things investigated in 90 days!â
When I think about jobs that canât practically be done by humans, I donât think of fraud analysis or remote well platforms in the North Sea: I think of online harassment. Facebook, Twitter and Google have no solution to trolling and abuse, because itâs just too much for a human team to handle. Could AI step in? âThatâs a great idea â we havenât applied our technology to that yet. Intel announced an initiative in anti-harassment which we havenât yet been involved in â youâve just motivated me to ping that person an email to say âcome on, letâs go. Letâs see how we can help youâ.â So if harassment on the internet is fixed by the time you read this, youâll know who to thank.
Itâs pretty clear from talking to Sheppard that the problems that appeal the most are the ones humans just donât have the capability to work on (âI sort of feel boring at the moment, because Iâm just solving some real-world mundane problems,â she says at one point), but those arenât always ones that fit with our profit-driven corporate world.
âThis is really important,â she explains, emphasising that whenever large corporations are involved in AI â including Intel â that theyâre doing so âfor mankind and bettering the world, as opposed to just for economic gainâ. Whether or not companies pay attention to those words over the coming decades could decide what our world looks like in 2050 â whether or not humans end up sidelined.